From

Location

Message

Date Posted

Linden,PA

What historically are the top pumpkins used as pollinators to produce heavy results?
Thanks, Mark

12/7/2008 4:38:23 PM

Minnesota

898 Knauss

12/7/2008 5:15:48 PM

Marshfield, Ma, USA

805 Pukos

12/7/2008 6:51:39 PM

Germany (Bavaria)

I also thought about the 1180 Daletas reading this post!

12/8/2008 6:28:40 AM

Germany (Bavaria)

...and 1407 Wolf...lol!

12/8/2008 6:30:15 AM

Ctpumpkin@optonline.net

Sometimes it pays to look more forward than back. 898 & 805 are proven pollinators but...

1502 Wallace maybe?
1041 McKie

12/8/2008 1:24:34 PM

Roselle, IL GJGEM@sbcglobal.net

1450 Wallace has done well

12/8/2008 3:47:07 PM

Minnesota

In the Photograph section, Jim-B, he has a pict. of his 898 Knauss remake, the 503 Beauchemin, he crossed the 503 Beauchemin and his 898 knauss remake, and made the 340 Beauchemin, I bet it is going to be a great pollinator.

12/8/2008 4:44:40 PM

Minnesota

Thats, 898Knauss remake x 898 Knauss = 340 Beauchemin

12/8/2008 5:44:09 PM

Menomonie, WI (mail@gr8pumpkin.net)

Lets make sure he does not think the male pollinator effects the pumpkins weight. It only effects the following years offspring

12/8/2008 5:52:30 PM

milford, CT,

You have to include the 1139 Sherwood and 1041 McKie as top Heavy % pollnators. Mark

12/8/2008 7:54:09 PM

1334 daletas

12/8/2008 9:49:10 PM

Western NY

1048 cox

12/8/2008 10:15:45 PM

Eugene,OR

1260 Weir

12/8/2008 11:07:02 PM