Pests, Diseases and Other Problems
|
Subject: BioPak vs BioPak Plus
|
|
From
|
Location
|
Message
|
Date Posted
|
markbirkmann |
central Missouri
|
Both of these contain Bacillus subtilis which I believe is the active ingredient in Rhapsody and Serenade. Even though BioPak Plus contains additional micros it has a lower amounts of rhizosphere bacteria. Which do you think is best? Assuming my soil test is looking good I'd think the BioPak would be the way to go. The BioPak also has a much higher percentage of sea kelp extract than BioPak plus. Mark
|
3/22/2006 4:57:02 PM
|
markbirkmann |
central Missouri
|
I forgot the links.
BioPak: http://www.planthealthcare.com/direct/PHCBioPak.pdf
BioPak Plus: http://www.planthealthcare.com/direct/PHCBioPakPlus.pdf
|
3/22/2006 5:32:43 PM
|
Tremor |
Ctpumpkin@optonline.net
|
I like the straight BioPaks in the preseason & then every 2 weeks until after fruit set.
BioPak Plus has 20% SOP potash so it is better as a finishing material.
|
3/22/2006 11:31:03 PM
|
Total Posts: 3 |
Current Server Time: 1/15/2025 10:39:53 AM |